News RSS Feed


Father knifed and burnt baby

3:39pm Tuesday 12th June 2007

comment Comments (4)   Have your say »


A father killed his 17 month old son six months after he won back custody of the neglected baby, a court heard.

Abid Ikram, 30, was convicted of cruelty against Talha Ikram who thrived when he was placed with foster parents.

But the courts agreed to allow Talha to return to Ikram and his mistress Samiara Parveen, 24, who is also is cousin.

The pair stubbed out cigarettes on the child and cut him so deeply his veins were left exposed, Southwark Crown Court heard.

Little Talha Ikram was left on the floor screaming in agony as his multiple fractures were left to "grind together", the court heard.

The baby finally died on September 6 last year when fat deposits from a broken thigh had invaded his lungs and suffocated him.

Prosecutor Jeremy Donne QC said: "The broken thigh killed Talha and whoever broke Talha's thigh killed Talha."

The lovers each deny counts of murder and causing or allowing the death of a child.

The QC said the baby had suffered apparent abuse and neglect ever since cousins Ikram and Parveen began living together.

The couple had given a variety of different accounts of the little boy's injuries, he said.

Parveen said the child had fallen down stairs and that a chair had collapsed on him.

Ikram explained away one injury with the words: "You know how naughty Talha can be."

Meanwhile Parveen bragged to one friend: "We go out late together alone late at night to buy food and shop and we leave the baby behind."

When the same confidante saw the pair out late she called the police who followed the couple back to their home in Ealing, West London.

There they found the child, then just 11-months-old, lying alone on the living room floor.

The jury were told Ikram, who had just days before won custody of the boy, admitted a child cruelty charge following the incident.

Mr Donne said: 'His son was taken into care where he thrived and flourished with foster parents.

"He took his first steps and even began to say a few words. He was a very active child.

"However following what was a fateful decision by the family court, Talha was returned to his father's care on March 23, last year.

"Six months later he was dead."

The court heard Talha's foster carers visited the little boy at home in Ealing a few weeks later.

He had a black eye and seemed quiet and unable to walk or move comfortably, jurors were told.

The carers urged Ikram to take the child to hospital and he agreed.

Over the next few months the infant suffered a series of injuries.

On the day of the baby's death Ikram called paramedics to day his son had stopped breathing.

He appeared "distraught" when medics were unable to revive the youngster while his lover appeared "calm", the court heard.

The paediatric doctor who examined the infant found injuries including fractures to the thigh and shin caused by the "pulling and twisting of limbs most likely the result of physical abuse".

He also had three fractured ribs and a burn on his back consistent with being burnt by a cigarette butt, the court heard.

The QC said: "The doctor stresses the obvious when he says this little boy must have suffered extreme pain."

Parveen and Ikram, of Cheltenham Place, Ealing, w London, each deny one count of murder and one of causing or allowing the death of a child.

The trial continues.


Your Say YourEaling Times

A Disgusted mum., Notts says...
9:40pm Tue 12 Jun 07

How many more innocent children have to die as a result of neglect and abuse at the hands of their own parents? how many?

Social Services should be MORE involved and visit MORE often. And what on earth were the courts thinking of allowing this little boy to be sent back to his "father" to be abused even more, and then be left to die?

The Social Services and the Judge should be held to account as well as the father. where was the childs mother in all this?


Happy, Australia says...
2:20pm Wed 13 Jun 07

Again, a child dies because of the idolatry of parental blood. Having the capacity to procreate does not make a parent; the way a child is treated does.
If not, then no one should be allowed to adopt as they are not the 'natural' parent and thus incapable of 'proper' parenting. This 'reunification' of at risk children with 'natural' parents is prevalent here in Australia too, with the same insane results.

Nawaz, UK says...
2:55pm Thu 14 Jun 07

Although I don't normally agree with too much interference by social services (there are many cases where they have mistakenly taken children away), this has to be an exception (with hindsight though).

I really do hope that the perps of this crime are dealt with accordingly, with the same harshness that they dealt with the child.

Nawaz.

nawaz, uk says...
1:09pm Sat 16 Jun 07

it seems we have not learnt lessons from past experiences such as Victoria Climbe. we deliver training and emphasise the importance of communication amongst different departments and yet still innocent children like Talha has to suffer? We really need to put our acts together. My question is, why talha was moved from his foster parents where he was enjoying his kife,safe and flourishing?

Comments are closed on this article.

Loans from Payday Loans

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »